From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
This patch adds a comment to "Documentation/SubmittingDrivers" about the
importance of adding a Copyright notice in submitted code.
The parisc-linux port has neglected this in the past and I've been slowly
trying to correct that (along with proper GPL header).
While I make it sound like GPL is the "only" acceptable license, I'll leave
it up to lawyers to determine what other appropriate license could be used
for a new driver.
to be useful to other communities such as BSD you may well
wish to release under multiple licenses.
+Copyright: The copyright owner must agree to use of GPL.
+ It's best if the submitter and copyright owner
+ are the same person/entity. If not, the name of
+ the person/entity authorizing use of GPL should be
+ listed in case it's necessary to verify the will of
+ the copright owner.
+
Interfaces: If your driver uses existing interfaces and behaves like
other drivers in the same class it will be much more likely
to be accepted than if it invents gratuitous new ones.