printk(KERN_INFO "input: %s on %s\n", atkbd->name, serio->phys);
}
+/*
+ * atkbd_reconnect() tries to restore keyboard into a sane state and is
+ * most likely called on resume.
+ */
+
+static int atkbd_reconnect(struct serio *serio)
+{
+ struct atkbd *atkbd = serio->private;
+ struct serio_dev *dev = serio->dev;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!dev) {
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "atkbd: reconnect request, but serio is disconnected, ignoring...\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (atkbd->write) {
+ if (atkbd_probe(atkbd))
+ return -1;
+
+ atkbd->set = atkbd_set_3(atkbd);
+ atkbd_enable(atkbd);
+ } else {
+ atkbd->set = 2;
+ atkbd->id = 0xab00;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Here we probably should check if the keyboard has the same set that
+ * it had before and bail out if it's different. But this will most likely
+ * cause new keyboard device be created... and for the user it will look
+ * like keyboard is lost
+ */
+
+ if (atkbd->translated) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 128; i++) {
+ atkbd->keycode[i] = atkbd_set2_keycode[atkbd_unxlate_table[i]];
+ atkbd->keycode[i | 0x80] = atkbd_set2_keycode[atkbd_unxlate_table[i] | 0x80];
+ }
+ } else if (atkbd->set == 2) {
+ memcpy(atkbd->keycode, atkbd_set2_keycode, sizeof(atkbd->keycode));
+ } else {
+ memcpy(atkbd->keycode, atkbd_set3_keycode, sizeof(atkbd->keycode));
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
+ if (atkbd->keycode[i] && atkbd->keycode[i] < 255)
+ set_bit(atkbd->keycode[i], atkbd->dev.keybit);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct serio_dev atkbd_dev = {
.interrupt = atkbd_interrupt,
.connect = atkbd_connect,
+ .reconnect = atkbd_reconnect,
.disconnect = atkbd_disconnect,
.cleanup = atkbd_cleanup,
};