http://svn.poeml.de/viewvc/ppc/src-unpacked/xscreensaver/xscreensaver-4.12.tar.bz2...

[xscreensaver] / configure

diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fc5b9fddab278a82f224ca3a785a6277a009cb99..085a7f01b717501ec86b007b3e6f3451375c1f34 100755 (executable)
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -1306,6 +1306,15 @@ done
 #       gcc.  Old gcc doesn't support -std, and new gcc doesn't support -lang.
 #       so much for compatibility!)
 #
+#       UPDATE: apparently there is NO WAY to tell gcc 3.2.2 to require that
+#       declarations preceed statements, without resorting to "-pedantic".
+#       This means that there is no way to get gcc3 to issue warnings that
+#       ensure that your code complies with the ANSI/ISO C89 standard, without
+#       also drowning in totally useless warnings.  Thank you master may I
+#       have another.
+#
+#       So, I give up, let's just use -pedantic.
+#
 ###############################################################################
 
 
@@ -2371,7 +2380,9 @@ fi
   if test -n "$GCC"; then
     echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: Turning on gcc compiler warnings." >&5
 echo "${ECHO_T}Turning on gcc compiler warnings." >&6
-    CC="$CC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs"
+    CC="$CC -pedantic -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs"
+    # supposedly gcc 3.4 will have "-Wdeclaration-after-statement"
+    # and then perhaps we can do without -pedantic?
   else
     case "$host" in
       *-irix5* |*-irix6.0-3* )
@@ -14869,7 +14880,7 @@ if test "${ac_cv_mesagl_version_string+set}" = set; then
   echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6
 else
   cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<EOF
-#line 14878 "configure"
+#line 14889 "configure"
 #include "confdefs.h"
 #include <GL/gl.h>
 #ifndef MESA_MAJOR_VERSION